Jump to content

Mal

Members
  • Content Count

    55
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Mal last won the day on June 24 2020

Mal had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

11 Good

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. See my post in Game Develolme t for my home brew doc
  2. Indeed this is how me fudged it in our game
  3. I have been working on a home-brew to address a lot of these concerns. I have made a separate post about it but I thought it might grab more attention if I popped it in here as well. 2 - Stargate Action System - Gatemasters Guide - v0.1.pdf 3 - Stargate Action System - Players Guide-v0.1.pdf
  4. Really, I should have posted this one first..... 2 - Stargate Action System - Gatemasters Guide - v0.1.pdf
  5. I have recently started to playtest the below. I would be keen to here any comments you all may have: The general aim is to make modern combat feel different from ranged attacks in 5e SRD, promote a cinematic style of action and address simulationist concerns. Big Changes Replacement of the upgrades system with fixed value weapons and seperate accessories. Requisitions points - used to procure weapons and accessories but do not replace back up weapons supplied with prep kits. Reloading sacrifices speed rather than actions. Minor changes include: cha
  6. I have done something similar but a bit deeper. Still lots of issues to work out though we have now started playtesting.
  7. I'm working on a ruleset to build any ranged weapon in under two pages - should work for Tau'ri and offworld weapons. Will post it here when it's done. Maybe a couple of days
  8. Yeah, I fed back something similar through the feedback form based on conversations with my players. Your characterisation of insufficient design space is bang on. In the interests of simplicity we've collapsed the complexity of the system to the point that in play it raises more questions than it answers. My suggestions were to (1) separate the upgrades into 'functions' and 'addons'. Functions are inherent to the weapon being stated (automatic, belt fed, etc), while add-ons can be added to any of the compatible types - that's your scopes, lasers etc. (2) limit the number of functio
  9. Some of the feats are good and the suppressing fire rules are okay. Disadvantage on attack may not matter when a lot of stuff will be at disadvantage anyway?
  10. I have had a scan of the two very extensive documents. A lot of work went in here and I don't see anything unworkable, although I think Asgard should remain a non-playable race. Thought your idea on multiple levels of disadvantage was interesting though. Still too complicated. I'd you have 2 levels of disadvantage/advantage, roll 3 d20s and pick the lowest would be perfectly fine and a lot simpler. The increased chance to hit/miss is already there in the number of dice you roll. The main issue here is that I think we're ties to having some classes because we have to maintai
  11. Yes, the system isn't perhaps totally ideal but I think this is a betamax/VHS debate. Sure, betamax had the best picture quality but they were expensive and no one used them. VHS was cheap and good enough for porn and that was that. Here, 5e is a the most mainstream system at the moment. Even though the Stargate system already differs substantially from 5e (moxie, determination, gestalt from 5the level, different races and classes etc) it will have wider appeal simply because it's a system a lot of people are conversant in.
  12. Always struck me that Jaffa going down easier would be down to better training and familiarisation. I can't imagine that confrontted with Alien warriors for the first time I would shoot my straightest. After a couple of encounters they would learn to shoot for the Symbiote pouch and the lighter chainmail parts of Jaffa armor. They become a known(ISH) quantity. It also strikes me that Jaffa armor is best suited to the weapons of the kind of civilisations they're usually suppressing and that it would probably be a waste of resources to equip a mass army that you don't mind taking a few los
  13. Ranges need looked at asap imho. The 1800m max range for a p90 or any other 'longarm' is ludicrous. Personally I feel like the combat mechanic generally need looked at. Just two sides pummeling each other isn't very interesting. We should design our combat scenarios with specific objectives (activate the switch, dial the gate and escape, power down the forcefield, retrieve the downed team member). Combat then becomes more about stopping the enemy getting in your way rather than chasing down every last mob and hp.
  14. I generally think this is a great idea. It provides a moderate degree of character customisation that is presently lacking - my guys are basically identikit except for their kits. I don't think it makes combat more complex on any real level. I think you might struggle to make the base damage values you've given work with attack specialist etc though. I think to decrease the combat focus even more the weapon you choose should effect social roles with NPCs. If you rock up with a Barret people might be a bit less welcoming than when you pack a discreet p90 - even if both can kill you just as
  15. These changes would certainly make my engineer happier. Shotguns should be rolled into longarms. I don't understand this idea that shotguns are for less combat oriented characters when I think the only time they're used in Stargate is in some of the most intense combat against the replicators. I personally feel there's a need to either provide stats for a few specific longarms from the series with some different ranges, damage dice, capacities. I don't think that's giving the game a combat focus. I think if you ignore handguns you end up with maybe 10 weapons that need stats. H
×
×
  • Create New...